In the circles in which I move there has been a resurgence of a softer, gentler kind of "reformed" theology that is tied to the popularity of several American mega-church pastors. I just hope it is not the another example of people jumping on the latest bandwagon in the hopes that if they imitate their ecclesiastical heroes they will be as famous as they are. I have lived long enough to see this happen on numerous occasions. It reveals a subconscious trust in technique to guarantee "success!" One of the lessons of church history is that God works in and through all sorts of different people and groups to accomplish his purposes. Most, if not all, of the American mega-churches would never work outside of the context in which they are found. Especially in a place like Canada, there are numerous examples of large American groups trying to plant churches using all the same techniques that have worked for them south of the border but with dramatically different results in this much more secular country.
Buoyed by their success in the United States, some mega-churches are establishing their own seminaries or training institutes to further extend their reach and establish their brand, or particular way of doing things. I have heard that one such group tells prospective church planters that "they are not just planting a church, but a _______ church!" Or that as a result of their training they want "their DNA to get into the students' blood." While this may be nothing more than grandiose overstatement, I fear that it indicates a franchise approach to doing church. Packaging one man's vision or way of doing things is short-sighted and can so easily involve an ironic denial of the major theological assumptions that these same individuals espouse and preach.
Much more helpful and healthy in the long run are co-operative efforts where many different churches within a particular theological perspective come together to train and strategize. There is wisdom in a multitude of counselors and there are different ways to do the same thing that are equally acceptable to God because they fall within the boundaries of his revelation. We must guard against a one-size-fits-all mentality when it comes to churches and groups of churches. We have have lots to learn from different people and ultimately we have to be faithful to what God calls us to do given our own unique circumstances and skill sets.
My own predication is that people will eventually reject the super organized, slickly run, very professional way of "doing church" for one in which there is genuine community, a sense of reverent awe, tradition and mystery that is so often lacking today. In fact I think many people already have rejected that model and that is why "church growth" is a misnomer in spite of everything that is being done. Today "church growth" is more accurately "consolidation" or about increased "market share" in a steadily declining market! The worship experience should be different than going to a Raptors basketball game minus the cheerleaders! Joy, solemnity, thoughtfulness, beauty, grandeur, intelligence, peace, conviction, resolve and many more things need to be cultivated and encouraged. May this new year see the Christian church as a whole make meaningful strides in this direction and may all of us in leadership keep our egos in check so we can see the greater glory.
4 comments:
Thank you Kirk for saying it as it is and fearfuly and lovingly instructing others in the ways of our Lord.
"There is wisdom in a multitude of counselors and there are different ways to do the same thing that are equally acceptable to God because they fall within the BOUNDARIES OF HIS REVELATION."
Those who lead and do not comply with God's direction: "BOUNDARIES OF HIS REVELATION" but instead try to fit God into their goals and interests,will also expect their followers to do the same. Over and over I have quietly observed this reality within the context of church. The cloning of individuals who have a deep egotistic desire to be affirmed,to belong to a community that will provide (Maxwell?)leadership positions. Such is this kind of leadership that when it opens his/her mouth it lacks solid biblical content. Both in what they say or how they counsel. They are usually very smooth, overly careful not reveal their immature spiritual condition. However they are extremely slick in the 21st century church business. They usually define spiritual gifts as talents, e.g. administrative, music instruments, etc. But will seldom mention Galatians 5:22; Ephesians 4:25f. There is also a tendency to down play God's holiness - moral character in the Law, while Christian liberty operates in serving a human agenda. I pray for myself and for all of God's children to increase in true spiritual discernment that can only come from the guidance of the Spirit and the WORD. That by HIS grace our LORD will navigate us through this maze of contradictions in the "doing" of church and programs.
Press on my Christian brothers and sisters!!
God's Blessings for the New Year!
KATA TON XRISTON
Dear Rev. Kirk:
You lost me here.. Are you disapproving the Mega Church or the attitude of some leaders or both.
On disapproving the mega church, I do attend one. yes there is an element of high structure and organization, which I think is neccessary. With an attendance of 1000, we have 8 pastors serving.
In the early church in the book of Acts, as the church grew and each day the LORD was adding believers, at one point the count was 5000 (which I think that qualify for a mega church). The apostles saw a need to appoint 7 deacons to serve tables. Later in the epistles there was more structuring as they also appointed some elders.
I understand for ethical reasons you can not mention a church name so one can understand the nature of the problem you are trying to convey. Myself have no much knowledge of other churches and their current issues. Down in the U.S. I know of John McArther and Chuck Swindoll who pastor mega churches. I listen to them on Radio and I wish I was under their teaching. As I am not there I cann't tell how they are structured or if they have any issues? With mega churches the element of the intemate community suffer a little, hence the need and importance of cell groups.
All this said I can not understand how the mega church concept is non biblical? And creating seminaries and bible colleges that are affliated with churches is a bad idea? Knowing the major problem that we have of biblical illetracy? As a side note isn't this how TBS started, with affiliation to Jarvis st.? Yet I understand all will depend on what kind of pastor and what kind of teacher and what is the message they are delivering?!! False teaching and teachers are a contineous problem to the church and faith.
If you are talking about a specific attitude in the ministry, I agree. Actually, I have seen it happening in a micro church. Some ethnic churches of an attendance of 15-20. They can hardly pay their expenses e.g. pastor salary and rent etc. yet they won't join another small one to form one strong church and they are in the same geographical area!
They would like to start their own bible teaching course. Those small churches are mainly know by the name of their pastor or founder leader!
As for the element of real worship, I have seen it happening in our mega church. Sunday in and Sunday out. Some get to their knees in repentance and surrender, while other still stand as a pillar of salt. One coming broken in total depravity while other come righteous still in his own eyes.
The wind still blows as it will, we don't know where it is coming from or to where it is going, we just see its effects.
We come to ministry with our feeble efforts, sometimes with selfish desires and motives the LORD pour HIS SPIRIT as HE wills. Same as the days of old the LORD choose and keep a remnant for HIMSELF.
You can call me a hyper calvinist. That is o.k. for I have seen it in the biblical history. YET THIS IS NOT AN EXCUSE FOR US TO CONTINUE DOING WHAT IS NOT RIGHT. JUST I URGE YOU TO POINT EXACTLY WHAT IS WRONG.
An ever grateful student and graduate of TBS,
God Bless
Dahlia Karkanis
Thank you for your comments Xristina and Dahlia, it is great to hear from those who read my blog.
Dahlia, my post was not about mega-churches per se. Large or small I think the Lord can use both. What I am talking about are new denominations (although they do not call themselves that), or denominations within denominations, that are distinguished from one another by the personalities who lead them or various approaches to ministry rather than anything that is distinctly theological. Over the long haul I fear that they are too personality and technique driven. We need more Christian churches period. We do not need more divisions along party lines. What I am concerned about is a situation analogous to the one Paul addressed in 1 Corinthians 1:12-17.
Rather than working together with other Christians certain branches of Christianity have a tendency to reinvent the "wheel" over and over. And with all due respect to them, while they are great at providing programs to keep Christians busy and out of trouble, they have done little to advance the gospel among the lost. Ultimately, the gospel is not about increasing our share of the Christian community, it is about taking the gospel to the world.
Thankyou for the clarification. Made sense now, specially as you attached the biblical verse.
This is again an old issue taking different form Phil. 1:12-18. "What then? Only that in every way , whether in pretense or in truth Christ is preached; and in this I rejoice, yes, and will rejoice."(v.18)
God help us all as we take the cause of the Ministry and the christian life.
Dahlia Karkanis
Post a Comment